|
Copyright © 2001 North Jersey
Media Group Inc.
Reprinted with Permission
The first jolt that
drowsy summer afternoon came a few minutes after 2.
Startled citizens
barely caught their breath when they were rocked again
seconds later.
The earthquake of
Aug. 10, 1884, toppled chimneys in New Jersey and New
York. Measuring a magnitude of 5.2 on the Richter scale
and centered in Rockaway, N.Y., it was classified as
"moderate" in intensity.
As people in the
Northwest found out this week, the earth can suddenly
come alive, even in places where such events are relatively
rare -- even in the New York metropolitan area.
Back in 1884, "a
rumbling sound accompanied the sinking of the earth,"
reported the Long Island Democrat of Jamaica. It hit
strongest along the New Jersey and Long Island coasts
and cracked masonry from Connecticut to Pennsylvania.
"Those in bathing
at Rockaway Beach ran from the surf crying, 'The world
has come to an end,' " the paper said. But no serious
injury or damage was reported.
Although temblors
that size occur about 800 times per year worldwide,
they strike here only once every couple of hundred years,
seismologists say. A magnitude-5 or greater quake likely
won't recur here for another century, they said.
But if and when it
does strike, it could wreak havoc because so many millions
of people and thousands of buildings are now crammed
together.
"Even though
these things don't occur that frequently, when they
do, we call them low probability, high-impact events
-- or extreme events," said Arthur Lerner-Lam,
a seismologist and senior research scientist at the
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University
in Palisades, N.Y.
"There has been
so much development since the last magnitude-5 quake
in 1884, that even though the probability of another
is low, if you measure risk . . . the potential impacts
are enormous," said Lerner-Lam, of Tenafly.
Few people know,
but New Jersey and New York sit on a highly active earthquake
zone. The area, in fact, ranks fourth nationally behind
Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle in quake activity,
though the degree of severity is much lower here, Lerner-Lam
said.
"There's usually
a fair amount of activity in the tri-state area,"
but most of it is barely detectable, he said.
There are several
magnitude-2 to 2.9 earthquakes -- classified as "very
minor" -- in the area every month. One "minor"
magnitude-3 to 3.9 quake occurs about once a year, and
a "light" 4 to 4.9 quake happens once every
four to 10 years, Lerner-Lam said.
The keys to all this local rumbling are the Ramapo fault
in North Jersey and the so-called 125th Street fault
across Manhattan.
The Ramapo fault
runs 70 miles northeast from Morris County, through
Ramsey and Suffern and the Hudson Highlands, to Bear
Mountain, N.Y. It follows the Ramapo River through the
Ramapo Mountains and is actually a "braid of faults,"
or a system of cracks, Lerner-Lam said.
Along this line --
to the point where Routes 17 and 287 now converge --
fierce quakes exploded daily and the Earth's crust split
open to welcome the Atlantic Ocean 200 million years
ago.
In New York, the
125th Street fault begins just south of the George Washington
Bridge on the Hudson and heads through Harlem, then
south across Central Park and the upper East Side, across
the East River, and under Queens.
To keep track of all the seismic activity, Lamont-Doherty
operates three quake-monitoring stations in Ringwood
and in Basking Ridge and Green Pond in Morris County.
Each station has a seismometer, an instrument that pinpoints
a quake by measuring the movement in the earth and combining
it with the exact time, which it receives from a satellite.
Observatory computers
send the data to the U.S. Geological Survey's National
Earthquake Information Center at Golden, Colo., near
Denver, which posts the information on the agency's
Web site, www.neic.cr.usgs.gov.
There is no record
of a locally "strong" quake, such as the magnitude-6.8
one that rattled Seattle on Wednesday, injuring more
than 320 people and causing an estimated $2 billion
in damage. There also have been no "major"
quakes, such as the 7.6 and 7.7 shocks in El Salvador
and India, respectively, that killed thousands of people
in January.
New Jersey has possibly been spared because it sits
in the middle of the North American tectonic plate --
one of 15 massive sections of the earth's crust. The
strongest quakes usually occur at plate boundaries --
such as the San Andreas fault in Southern California
-- when massive amounts of subterranean stress and stored
energy press the plates together.
Another active area
of the country is in Missouri, where four great earthquakes
struck in 1811 and 1812, leveling the town of New Madrid
and changing the course of the Mississippi River.
What could happen
here? Several projects are under way to gauge how well
prepared New Jersey is to withstand the next relatively
"big one."
Scott Stanford, a
glacial geologist with the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection, spent the past two years sending
his own shock waves through different soil types in
Bergen and Hudson counties and in Newark.
Wearing ear plugs
and steel-tipped shoes, Stanford banged a steel plate
with a 10-pound sledgehammer at selected sites to see
how conductive the ground was to earthquakes. As suspicious
residents looked on, Stanford whacked the plate, then
recorded the time it took the waves to travel 100 feet
to an instrument called a geophone.
He added the results
to data from test borings that engineers had made at
thousands of construction sites over the years. He then
ran all the numbers through a computer program to project
losses from quakes.
He found that if
a magnitude-7 quake hit Bergen County, it might kill
223 people and hospitalize 2,200 others. Such a quake
might also damage 180,500 buildings -- including 14,100
that would be destroyed. It would cause billions of
dollars in damage.
"That's the
wonder of computers. It's totally fictional," Stanford
said of the program, called HAZUS, which was designed
for the West Coast, where the earth's crust is more
fragmented and can tend to overestimate damage. Stanford's
data also did not include structural improvements made
to buildings.
"I don't know
how they figure the casualties. It would depend on the
time of day, on whether people are on the roads,"
said Stanford, whose project is sponsored the New Jersey
State Police and the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
The shakiest ground
in Bergen County, Stanford found, was in the Meadowlands,
which include a lot of glacial lake sand deposits. Similar
sand was found along the Hudson County waterfront, he
said. Ground-shaking diminishes farther north as the
ground contains more gravel, he said.
"It's not so
much the shaking, as the type of soil and the type of
construction" that determines damage to buildings,"
said Stanford, who will soon begin calculating damage
estimates for Essex County.
Not that sports fans
at Giants Stadium should necessarily worry more about
quakes.
"When you talk
about individual structures, it's a question of how
they were engineered," Stanford said. "The
way they prepared each site in the Meadowlands might
be somewhat different."
Not just buildings
but whole nations must prepare to meet and rebound from
natural disasters, Lerner-Lam said.
"What you'd
like to do is build resilient societies, like the United
States, where we worry about issues of insurance and
building codes," said Lerner-Lam, head of the Advanced
National Seismic System-Northeast Region, part of a
national effort to update earthquake monitoring.
"But are we
really safe? Are we giving enough attention to low probability,
high-impact events? Do we have the political and economic
mechanism in place to deal with these complex risks?"
he asked.
And what about investing
in earthquake insurance? Lerner-Lam, the seismologist,
does not carry such insurance on his Tenafly home.
"I'm in a well-constructed
house," he said. "I live on bedrock."
Staff Writer Bob Groves' e-mail address
is groves@northjersey.com
Copyright © 2001 North Jersey
Media Group Inc.
Related site:
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Seismology,
Geology & Tectonophysics Group
|