Hydrology BC ENV 3025

HYDROLOGY - Homework # 7

1) (36 points) Water Balance of the 1993 Midwest Flood (excercise after David R. Maidment and Pawel Mizgalewicz, University of Texas at Austin)

Introduction

In 1993, the Midwestern States of the United States suffered their worst flood in more than 40 years. Heavy rains sustained throughout the summer flooded Iowa and portions of surrounding States. President Clinton appointed a team called the Scientific Assessment and Strategy Team (SAST) to examine the flood events, collect and analyze data, and report on the policy implications of the flood. How could the effects of future floods of this type be mitigated through policy changes? Should levees that breached in the flood be rebuilt? Has the draining of wetlands in the Midwest created flood hazards downstream? If so, what effect would recreating some of these wetlands have on flood discharges?

The SAST team met and worked for several months at the US Geological Survey's EROS Data Center where they compiled a considerable volume of data, some of it displayed on the SAST Home Page. In February, 1994, the SAST team convened a meeting of hydrologists and hydraulic engineers from around the United States to review the team's work and to suggest new lines of activity. It was fairly clear at this meeting that hydrologic practice at the time could not address very well the huge regional scope of the flood: the affected region has an area of approximately 700,000 km2, and most of the studies presented at the meeting dealt with areas of the order of 10 to 100 km2.

At this meeting, Dr Maidment proposed that a daily water balance study should be carried out to look in a spatially distributed way at the amount of precipitation, evaporation, change in storage, inflow and outflow of water in the region. This study was eventually funded by the US Geological Survey and jointly undertaken by the Center for Research in Water Resources of the University of Texas at Austin, and the Department of Geography of the University of Utah. Its methods and preliminary results can be reviewed on the SAST Water Balance Page.

This exercise is based on some of the data generated in that study. The data presented here are for the SAST region taken as a single unit, comprising all the drainage area of the Upper Mississippi River and a portion of the Missouri River drainage, primarily capturing westward flowing water from Western Iowa. There are five inflow points to the study region where flow coming into the Missouri River from Eastward flowing tributaries enters the region. There is one outflow point, the Mississippi River at Thebes, Illinois, just above the confluence of the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers. All inflows and outflow points are monitored by USGS gages reporting daily discharge.

Daily precipitation over the region is estimated by interpolation from records of more than 1000 gages. Daily evaporation over the region is estimated by taking National Weather Service Maps of potential evaporation, and finding the factor (0.775) which when used to multiply the potential evaporation ensures that the annual water balance from January 1 to December 31, 1993, is approximately closed.

Goals of the Exercise

Computer and Data Requirements

Dowload the water balance data: Comma-delimited text file: midwest.csv
The data consist of:

Column 1: Date (month/day/year)
Column 2: Outflow [m3/s] from the region (discharge measured in the Mississippi R. at Thebes, IL.)
Column 3-7: Inflow [m3/s] into the region measured at five sites where rivers drain into the study region from the West:

Column 8: Average Precipitation over the Region[mm/d]
Column 9: Average Evapotranspiration over the Region[mm/d]

Drainage area within the study boundary = 698525 km2

Conversion factors:
1 d = 86400 s
1 m = 1000 mm
1 km = 1000 m = 1,000,000 mm
1 cfs = 0.028317 m3/s
1 in = 2.54 cm
1 m = 3.2808 ft

Procedure

The daily water balance is to be constructed for 365 days, 1 January to 31 December 1993.
  1. Convert the outflow series of the Mississippi River at Thebes, Ill, into a series of equivalent depths in mm/day by converting the daily discharge into an equivalent volume in m3/day and then dividing by the drainage area.
  2. Aggregate the five inflow series into a single total inflow series and similarly convert the total to an equivalent depth of water in mm/day by dividing by the drainage area.
  3. Construct a spreadsheet with date in the first column and the succeeding four columns being precipitation, evaporation, inflow and outflow, all in mm/day. To make a date field in Excel, type 1/1/93 in the first column, use a formula to add 1 to get the date in the next row in this column, then copy the result to succeeding rows.
  4. Add two additional columns, the change in storage each day computed as:


    5. Change in Storage = Precip - Evap + Inflow - Outflow

    and the total accumulated storage in the region, assuming that the storage was initially 30mm on 1 January 1993.

    The result should look something like this:

  5. Determine the annual total precipitation, evaporation, inflow, outflow and change in storage for the region. Is the annual water balance reasonably closed?
  6. Plot a graph showing the outflow in mm/day and the storage in mm against the date. Prepare the graph in the usual way in Excel and then click on the outflow line once the graph is plotted, bring up a dialog box, click on "axis" and select "secondary" to get both the outflow and the storage plotted with different y axes.


    7. The result should look something like this:

  7. It appears that the bulk of the flood occured over a two month period from 1 July to 31 August 1993. Prepare a new spreadsheet for this period. Determine the series (precipitation - evaporation) and (outflow - inflow), all in mm/day and plot them. The result should look something like this:

RESULTS TO BE TURNED IN:
  1. (8 points) The total annual precipitation, evaporation, inflow, and outflow in mm for 1993. What is the annual net outflow (outflow - inflow) in mm? What percentage of the annual precipitation within the region evaporated and what percentage drained out of the region in the Mississippi River?
  2. (8 points) A graph showing the storage (mm) and the discharge (mm/day) for the period Jan 1 to December 31, 1993. What was the peak depth of storage on the land surface? When did it occur? What was the peak discharge (mm/day and m3/s) at the outflow point? When did it occur? What was the lag time between the peak storage and the peak discharge?
  3. (8 points) Present a spreadsheet showing the daily water balance analysis for July and August 1993. This should include date, precipitation, evaporation, inflow, outflow, change in storage and storage, in mm. Plot a graph showing (precipitation - evaporation) and (outflow - inflow). What effect does flow through the region have on smoothing the time variations in precipitation?
  4. (8 points) For this two month period, what was the total precipitation, evaporation, inflow, outflow and change in storage in mm? What was the net outflow (outflow - inflow) in mm? What percentage of the precipitation left the region as evaporation? What percentage of the precipitation flowed out of the region as net outflow?

    5. (4 points) Do something interesting with the data that has not been requested as part of this exercise. Analyse some aspect of this problem and present a brief description of what you have determined.