Isotope Hydrology HW-1, answer key

1) (12 points) The dimensionless Reynolds number R is defined as R= ULr/m, where U = a characteristic velocity [L T-1]; L = a characteristic length [L]; r = fluid density [M L-3]; m = viscosity [M L-1 T-1]. Fig shows the relationship between friction factor f ( a measure of the friction in pipes)and Reynolds number R for smooth pipes which is measured in laboratory experiments over a range of Reynolds numbers. The break in the measurements at Reynolds numbers between 2000 and 4000 marks the transition from laminar to turbulent flow.

a) Calculate the Reynolds number for typical groundwater flow in a clean sand. Use as characteristic length L a typical pore size for sand (Fig) and determine the velocity U from Darcy's law. Assume a hydraulic gradient of 1/100, a typical hydraulic conductivity (Fig), and density/viscosity (Fig).  Do you expect to find laminar or turbulent flow?

I assume a pore diamter of 0.5 mm, hydraulic conductivity of  K=10-4 m/s  and a porosity of n=0.3 (clean sand), a viscosity of m=1.3*10-3 Pa*s (10oC), a density of 1000 kg/m3. Please note that this is just a rough estimate, therfore it is not necessary to chose exactly the same numbers. With Darcy's law the velocity is U = K/n * 1/00 = 3.3*10-6 m/s (= 100 m/year). The Reynolds number then is: R= ULr/m = 3.3*10-6m/s * 0.5*10-3m * 1000 kg/m3 / 1.3*10-3 Pas = 1.3*10-3. This Reynolds number is safely in the laminar domain (Fig). 

b) Imagine flow of water through a limestone cave. Could the flow be turbulent there? Make a quantitative argument.

Most of you have seen a limestone cave before. Water flowing through the cave is dissolving the limestone and creates wide pathways. I am assuming a flow velocity similar to that in small streams: U =  0.5m/s, a length scale (diameter of the flowpath) of 1 m. Using the definition of the Reynolds number we are getting R = ULr/m = 0.5 m/s * 1m * 1000 kg/m3 / 1.3*10-3 Pas = 3.9*105, indicating that we can easly have turbulent flow in limestone caves. 

2)  (12 points) Flood estimate
A construction project is planned for a small non-monitored stream near Oracle Arizona. This stream is typically dry during most of the year, but floods during extreme presipitation events. The planning agency is concerned that their construction site might be flooded during extreme years and wants to know how high the water might be able to rise in the stream. One way is to estimate the maximum amount of precipitation to be expected in a day, assume that all the water makes it into the stream (no evaporation) and then convert the discharge rate into a depth using Manning's equation.

Info you'll  need:

Manning
a) Use the maximum daily precipitation rate in the record as best estimate for the worst case scenario.

The maximum daily precipitation (2.17 inch/day) is the best estimate for the worst case scenario

b) Calculate the maximum discharge in the stream assuming that all that precipitation comes down and enters the stream in 2 hours. Express the result in metric SI units.

Discharge in the river can then be calculated: Qmax = 42.3 miles2 * (1609.3 m/mile)2 * 2.17 inch * 0.0254 m/inch / 2 hours / 3600 s/hour =  839 m3/s.

c) Assume that the channel has a V-shape cross section, with a 90o angle at the bottom (draw a little sketch). Let us call the length of the sides of the "V": L and the depth of the channel: h. Then RH = area/wetted perimeter = L2/(2*2*L) = L/4. Remember that Q=A*U, with A being L2/2. Rearange Mannings equation to get L. Then convert L into h, using L2 = 2h2, valid for this particular triangle. So, how deep can the stream get and how far from the center do you need to be in order to avoid flooding?

Mannings equation for this example then reads: 2Q/L2 = kappa/n*(L/4)2/3S1/2

The equation can then be solved for L: L = (2*Q*n*42/3 / (kappa*S1/2))1/(2+2/3) 

=> L = 40.2m  => h = L/21/2 = 28.4m

so the depth of the V-notch stream (and also the distance between the edge and the center of the stream) would be 28.4 m.