0
|
1 |
======================================================================
|
|
2 |
R E A D M E
|
|
3 |
doc: Fri Dec 17 17:57:14 2010
|
|
4 |
dlm: Fri Dec 17 17:57:14 2010
|
|
5 |
(c) 2010 A.M. Thurnherr
|
|
6 |
uE-Info: 18 52 NIL 0 0 72 3 2 4 NIL ofnI
|
|
7 |
======================================================================
|
|
8 |
|
|
9 |
This version was copied from ANTS. It is a slightly extended version
|
|
10 |
that was used for the IEEE abstract. It works for the P403 YOYO, most
|
|
11 |
stations of the DIMES US2 Drake-passage section, and several of the
|
|
12 |
early DIMES UK2 grid stations.
|
|
13 |
|
|
14 |
This version attempts to determine the optimal lag for each LADCP
|
|
15 |
ensemble, allowing only a moderate number of time jumps. This behavior
|
|
16 |
is intended to allow processing of CTD files with dropped records. The
|
|
17 |
problem is that the data near the surface are noisy and can throw the
|
|
18 |
lagging algorithm off whack. Sometimes the problem can be solved by
|
|
19 |
slightly adjusting the initial guess lag. Sometimes the problem can be
|
|
20 |
solved by using -m to limit the allowed magnitude of the vertical
|
|
21 |
velocities. Overall, I think that the code is buggy. It could probably
|
|
22 |
be improved by skipping early CTD time jumps if they are too large to be
|
|
23 |
realistic. However, after having applied this version to several
|
|
24 |
different data sets, it appears that skipped CTD records are not all
|
|
25 |
that common. Therefore, I will continue development with a simpler
|
|
26 |
version that does not allow for skipped CTD records.
|
|
27 |
|