Absolute earthquake locations with differential data

Publication Status is "Submitted" Or "In Press: 
LDEO Publication: 
Publication Type: 
Year of Publication: 
2004
Authors: 
Editor: 
Journal Title: 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Journal Date: 
Dec
Place Published: 
Tertiary Title: 
Volume: 
94
Issue: 
6
Pages: 
2254-2264
Section / Start page: 
Publisher: 
ISBN Number: 
0037-1106
ISSN Number: 
Edition: 
Short Title: 
Accession Number: 
ISI:000226293400020
LDEO Publication Number: 
Call Number: 
Abstract: 

Notwithstanding the commonly held wisdom that "you can't determine the absolute location of earthquakes using the double-difference method," you can. We present a way of visualizing double-difference data, and use it to show how differential arrival-time data can, in principle, be used to determine the absolute locations of earthquakes. We then analyze the differential form of Geiger's Method, which is the basis of many double-difference earthquake-location algorithms, and show that it can be used to make estimates of the absolute location of earthquake sources. Finally, we examine absolute-location error in one earthquake-location scenario, using Monte Carlo simulations that include both measurement error and velocity model error, and show that the double-difference method produces absolute locations with errors that are comparable in magnitude, or even less, than traditional methods. The improvement in absolute locations arises from exactly the same, and often-cited, reasons that the double-difference method yields superior relative locations: observations of differential travel times determined via cross correlation have a much smaller error than observations of absolute travel times determined via phase picking; and predictions of differential travel times are less sensitive to unmodeled near-surface heterogeneity than are predictions of absolute travel times. Absolute earthquake locations that are already routinely produced by most implementations of the double-difference method have a better accuracy than has been credited.

Notes: 

887GITimes Cited:10Cited References Count:9

DOI: