Variations in the accumulation rate of barium in marine sediments are thought to be indicative of variations in marine biological productivity through time. However, the use of Ba as a proxy for paleoproductivity is partly dependent upon its being preserved in the sediment record in a predictable or consistent fashion. Arguments in favor of high Ba preservation are partly based on the assumption that sediment porewaters are generally at saturation with respect to pure barite. The idea is that because nondetrital sedimentary Ba predominantly exists as barite, porewater saturation would promote burial. We present sediment porewater, sediment solid phase, and benthic incubation chamber data suggesting that solid-phase Ba preservation may be compromised in some geochemical settings. We propose that under suboxic diagenetic conditions, characterized by low bottom water oxygen and high organic carbon respiration rates, Ba preservation may be reduced. Independent of the mechanism, if this assertion is true, then it becomes important to know when the Ba record is unreliable. We present evidence demonstrating that the sedimentary accumulation of authigenic U may serve as a proxy for when the Ba record is unreliable. We then provide an example from the Southern Ocean during the last glacial period where high authigenic U concentrations coincide with high Pa:Th ratios and high accumulation rates of biogenic opal, but we find low accumulation rates of sedimentary Ba. Thus, for the study sites presented here during the last glacial, we conclude that Ba is an unreliable productivity proxy. Copyright (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd.
185LFTimes Cited:106Cited References Count:78