"The North Atlantic Oscillation"
November, 28- December 1, 2000
University of Vigo (Orense campus), Orense, Galicia, Spain
James
Hurrell, Yochanan Kushnir and Martin Visbeck, Conveners
Organising Committee:
C.
Appenzeller, M. Baldwin, T.
Delworth, C. Deser, K. Drinkwater, H. Graf, P. Lamb, J. Marshall, M.
McCartney, L. Polvani, D.B. Stephenson
and R. Sutton
Tuesday, November 28: a.m. |
Atmospheric Processes |
---|---|
Tuesday, November 28: p.m. |
Global Climate Change and the NAO |
Wednesday, November 29: a.m. |
Ocean, Land, Sea-Ice Response to the NAO |
Wednesday, November 29: p.m. |
Coupled Ocean-Land-Seaice-Atmosphere Processes |
Thursday, November 30: a.m. |
Impacts of the NAO |
Thursday, November 30: p.m. |
Indices (Instrumental and Proxy) |
Friday, December 1: a.m. |
Predictability |
The detailed program is here. List of all submitted abstracts is here
Significant funding for this conference was obtained from the:
National Science Foundation (ATM and OCE) and
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (OGP)
Majordomo
NAO_list server
We have
started a moderated list server nao_list@ldeo.columbia.edu
that will be used to update attendees about the
logistics of the
conference. If you like to subscribe or unsubscribe yourself please
send mail to majordomo@ldeo.columbia.edu
with the text: subscribe nao_list my@mail
Results from the Chapman Conference Survey
How would you rate this Chapman Conference compared to other specialty conferences you have attended? |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
0.98 |
% |
One of the poorest |
|
13 |
12.75 |
% |
Middle of the pack |
|
76 |
74.51 |
% |
One of the best |
|
12 |
11.76 |
% |
Best |
|
|
|
|
|
How would you rate this Chapman Conference compared to any other conferences you have attended this year? |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
0.97 |
% |
One of the poorest |
|
14 |
13.59 |
% |
Middle of the pack |
|
18 |
17.48 |
% |
Second best |
|
70 |
67.96 |
% |
Best of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
The Organization of this Conference was |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
% |
Poor |
|
1 |
0.94 |
% |
Fair |
|
24 |
22.64 |
% |
Adequate |
|
52 |
49.06 |
% |
Very Good |
|
29 |
27.36 |
% |
Excellent |
|
|
|
|
|
Size of the Conference was |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
18.52 |
% |
Too large |
|
4 |
3.7 |
% |
Not large enough |
|
84 |
77.78 |
% |
About right |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of presentations was |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
8.33 |
% |
Too many |
|
13 |
12.04 |
% |
Too few |
|
86 |
79.63 |
% |
About right |
|
|
|
|
|
Length of oral presentations (on the average) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
0.93 |
% |
Too long |
|
0 |
0 |
% |
Too brief |
|
107 |
99.07 |
% |
About right |
|
|
|
|
|
Time for discussion of oral papers was |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
2.75 |
% |
Too long |
|
21 |
19.27 |
% |
Not long enough |
|
85 |
77.98 |
% |
About right |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of posters was |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
36.11 |
% |
Too many |
|
3 |
2.78 |
% |
Too few |
|
66 |
61.11 |
% |
About right |
|
|
|
|
|
Would you attend another Chapman Conference? |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
43.12 |
% |
Definitely |
|
51 |
46.79 |
% |
Probably |
|
11 |
10.09 |
% |
Perhaps |
|
0 |
0 |
% |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
Would you attend another Chapman Conference on this topic? |
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
61.11 |
% |
Definitely |
|
28 |
25.93 |
% |
Probably |
|
13 |
12.04 |
% |
Perhaps |
|
1 |
0.93 |
% |
No |
The full survey results are available here
Local
organizing committee:
Ricardo
Garcia, email rgarcia@6000aire.fis.ucm.es
Luis Gimeno, email
l.gimeno@uvigo.es
The full text proposal which is also a nice summary about the NAO is here check for updates: http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/NAO