"The North Atlantic Oscillation"
November, 28- December 1, 2000
University of Vigo (Orense campus), Orense, Galicia, Spain
James
Hurrell, Yochanan Kushnir and Martin Visbeck, Conveners
List of sessions:
Tuesday a.m.: Global climate change and the NAO
(H. Graf, Y. Kushnir, and M. Visbeck)
Tuesday p.m.: Ocean, land, sea-ice response to the NAO
(T. Delworth and M. McCartney)
Wednesday a.m.: Atmospheric processes
(M. Baldwin and L. Polvani)
Wednesday p.m.: Coupled ocean-land-sea ice-atmosphere processes
(J. Marshall and C. Deser)
Thursday a.m.: Indices (instrumental and proxy)
(C. Appenzeller and J. Hurrell)
Thursday p.m.: Impacts of the NAO
(K. Drinkwater and P. Lamb)
Friday a.m.: Predictability
(D. Stephenson and R. Sutton)
Abstract deadline:
September 15, 2000 http://www.agu.org
Links to more information about the region:
http://www.galinor.es/horense.html Information about Orense including a list of hotels and maps of Galicia
http://www.uvigo.es/campus/orense/ Information about the Orense campus of the University of Vigo
Airports: Vigo and Santiago de Compostela
check for updates: http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/NAO
The
proposal:
General Description and Scientific Statement
The purpose of this proposed Chapman Conference is to bring together atmospheric scientists, oceanographers and paleoclimatologists with interests in interannual to multidecadal climate variability and its predictability as well as scientists who study the socio-economic impacts of climate variability. The conference will focus on the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), which is a poorly understood yet dominant pattern of atmospheric circulation variability. In order to advance understanding of this topic, it is critical to foster better communication amongst these groups of scientists.
What is the NAO and why is it important?
The climate of the Atlantic sector and surrounding continents exhibits considerable variability on a wide range of time scales. Improved understanding of this variability is essential to assess the likely range of future climate fluctuations and the extent to which these fluctuations are predictable, and to assess the potential impact of climate change due to anthropogenic forcing.
A substantial portion of the climate variability over the Atlantic basin is associated with the NAO, which is a dominant pattern of atmospheric circulation variability. The NAO refers to a meridional oscillation in atmospheric mass with centers of action near Iceland and over the subtropical Atlantic from the Azores across the Iberian Peninsula. When the NAO is in its positive phase, low pressure anomalies over the Icelandic region and throughout the Arctic combine with high-pressure anomalies across the subtropical Atlantic to produce stronger-than-average westerlies across middle latitudes. This phase of the oscillation is, consequently, associated with cold conditions over the northwest Atlantic and warm weather over Europe, as well as wet conditions from Iceland through Scandinavia and dry conditions over southern Europe. This pattern of climate anomalies, which has been recognized at least since Walker and Bliss (1932), is most pronounced during winter when atmospheric teleconnection patterns such as the NAO are strongest.
A remarkable feature of the NAO that has motivated much recent study is its trend toward a more positive phase over the past 30 years. In fact, the magnitude of this recent trend appears to be unprecedented in the observational record (Hurrell 1995a), and based on reconstructions using paleoclimate data, perhaps over the past several centuries as well (Stockton and Glueck 1999). The most pronounced anomalies have occurred since the winter of 1989 (Hurrell 1995a; Walsh et al. 1996; Thompson and Wallace 1998; Watanabe and Nitta 1999) when record positive values of an index of the NAO have been recorded. Moreover, the trend in the NAO accounts for several remarkable changes recently in the climate and weather over the middle and high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, as well as in marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Among these changes are:
_ Strengthened subpolar westerlies from the surface to the lower stratosphere (Thompson et al. 1999).
_ Milder winters in Europe downstream across Asia juxtaposed against more severe winters over eastern Canada and the northwest Atlantic (Hurrell 1995a; Wallace et al. 1995; Hurrell 1996; Shabbar et al. 1997; Thompson and Wallace 1998).
_ Pronounced regional changes in precipitation patterns (Hurrell 1995a; Hurrell and van Loon 1997; Dai et al. 1997) resulting in the advance of some northern European glaciers (Hagen 1995; Sigurdsson and Jonsson 1995) and the retreat of Alpine glaciers (Frank 1997).
_ Changes in sea-ice cover in both the Labrador and Greenland Seas as well as over the Arctic (Chapman and Walsh 1993; Maslanik et al.1996; Cavalieri et al. 1997; Parkinson et al. 1998; McPhee et al. 1998; Deser et al. 1999).
_ Pronounced decreases in mean sea level pressure (SLP) over the Arctic (Walsh et al. 1996).
_ Changes in the physical properties of Arctic sea water (Sy et al. 1997; Morison et al. 1998; McPhee et al. 1998; Dickson 1999; Dickson et al. 1999a,b).
_ Changes in the intensity of convection in the Labrador and the Greenland-Iceland Seas (Dickson et al. 1996; Houghton 1996) which in turn influence the strength and character of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation.
_ Stratospheric cooling over the polar cap (Randel and Wu 1999), and total column ozone losses poleward of 40oN (Randel and Wu 1999; Thompson et al. 1999).
_ Changes in storm activity and the shifts in the Atlantic storm track (Hurrell 1995b), changes in within season variability such as blocking (Nakamura 1996).
_ Trend in North Atlantic surface wave heights (Kushnir et al. 1997).
_ Changes in the production of zooplankton and the distribution of fish (e.g., Fromentin and Planque 1996).
_ Changes in the length of the growing season over Europe (Post and Stenseth 1999), and changes in the population dynamical processes of several terrestrial species (Post et al. 1999; Stenseth et al. 1999).
All these appear to be strongly related to the recent trend in the NAO.
This unprecedented behavior of the NAO in recent decades and, more generally, its pronounced low-frequency behavior over the longer record have added to the debate over our ability to detect and distinguish between natural and anthropogenic climate change. Hurrell (1996) has shown, for example, that the recent upward trend in the NAO accounts for much of the observed regional surface warming over Europe and Asia, as well as the cooling over the northwest Atlantic over the past several decades. The NAO accounts for about one-third of the hemispheric interannual surface temperature variance over the past 60 winters. Since global average temperatures are dominated by temperature variability over the northern landmasses, a significant fraction of the recent warming trend in global surface temperatures can thus be explained as a response to observed changes in atmospheric circulation. In particular, changes over the North Atlantic are associated with the NAO (see also Graf et al. 1995; Thompson et al. 1999). Since the NAO is a natural mode of atmospheric variability, one could argue that much of the recent warming is not related to the build-up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere over the past century. This viewpoint, however, ignores the possibility that anthropogenic climate change might influence modes of natural variability, perhaps making it more likely that one phase or another of the NAO be preferred over the other phase (Palmer 1999; Corti et al. 1999). Understanding the physical mechanisms that govern the NAO and its intraseasonal-to-interdecadal variability, and how modes of natural variability such as the NAO may be influenced by anthropogenic climate change remain, therefore, central research questions.
What are the mechanisms which govern NAO variability?
Although the NAO is a natural mode of variability of the atmosphere, surface, stratospheric or even anthropogenic processes may influence its phase and amplitude. At present there is no consensus on the process or processes that are responsible for observed low frequency variations in the NAO, including its unprecedented upward trend over past 30 years.
There is ample evidence which shows that much of the atmospheric circulation variability in the form of the NAO arises from internal atmospheric processes. Atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs) forced with climatological annual cycles of solar insolation and sea surface temperature (SST), and fixed atmospheric trace-gas composition, display NAO-like fluctuations (e.g., Kitoh et al. 1996; Saravanan 1998; Osborn et al. 1999; Shindell et al. 1999). The governing dynamical mechanisms are eddy mean flow interaction at the exit region of the Atlantic storm track and eddy-eddy interaction between baroclinic transients and low-frequency variability (Wallace and Lau 1985; Lau and Nath, 1991; Ting and Lau, 1993; Hurrell, 1995a). Such intrinsic atmospheric variability exhibits little temporal coherence so that the low-frequency variations evident in the ~150-year observational record of the NAO could be interpreted as sampling variability. Wunsch (1999), for instance, has argued that the observed NAO record cannot be easily distinguished from a random stationary process. Indeed, the spectral density of the NAO is nearly white with only slight broadband features near biennial and decadal time scales (Hurrell and van Loon 1997; Jones et al. 1997). However, paleoclimate evidence suggests that NAO variability is highly intermittent and does not exhibit a preferred time scale (Appenzeller et al. 1998a). Nonetheless, the climate system is not stationary, so alternative hypotheses to stationarity also need to be posed (Trenberth and Hurrell 1999). The trend evident in the NAO index over the past 30 years, for instance, exhibits a high degree of statistical significance relative to the background interannual variability (Thompson et al. 1999), and it exceeds the interdecadal variability during the first 100 plus years of the instrumental record. While paleoclimate evidence suggests that prolonged positive and negative NAO phases have occurred in the past (Appenzeller et al. 1998a; Cook et al. 1998; Mann 1999; Luterbacher et al. 1999; Schmutz et al. 2000), the extreme positive values of the index evident since the late 1980s may be unprecedented over the past 5 centuries (Stockton and Glueck 1999). Either the recent trend is a reflection of natural variability occurring on multi-decadal or longer time scales, or it is a component of the global response to external forcing (Corti et al. 1999).
Recently, Thompson and Wallace (1998; 1999) suggested that the NAO might be more appropriately thought of as an annular (zonally symmetric) hemispheric mode of variability characterized by a seesaw of atmospheric mass between the polar cap and the middle latitudes in both the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean basins. A very similar structure is also evident in the Southern Hemisphere. They name this mode the Arctic Oscillation (AO) and showed that, during winter, its vertical structure extends deep into the stratosphere. Similar findings have previously been recognized in the context of tropospheric-stratospheric coupling (Baldwin et al. 1994; Perlwitz and Graf 1995; Cheng and Dunkerton 1995; Kitoh et al. 1996; Kodera et al. 1996). During winters when the stratospheric vortex is strong, the AO (and NAO) tends to be in a positive phase. Baldwin and Dunkerton (1999) suggest that the signal propagates from the stratosphere downward to the surface, so that the recent trends in the tropospheric circulation over the North Atlantic could be related to processes which affect the strength of the stratospheric polar vortex. For instance, tropical volcanic eruptions (Robock and Mao 1992; Kodera 1994; Kelly et al. 1996), ozone depletion (Volodin and Galin 1999), and changes in greenhouse gas concentrations resulting from anthropogenic forcing (Graf et al. 1995; Shindell et al. 1999) all may act to cool the polar stratosphere and strengthen the polar vortex.
On the other hand, it has long been recognized that fluctuations in SST and the strength of the NAO are related (Bjerknes 1964), and there are clear indications that the North Atlantic Ocean varies significantly with the overlying atmosphere. The leading mode of SST variability over the North Atlantic during winter consists of a tri-polar pattern with a cold anomaly in the subpolar region, a warm anomaly in the middle latitudes centered off of Cape Hatteras, and a cold subtropical anomaly between the equator and 30N (e.g., Deser and Blackmon 1993, Kushnir 1994). The emergence of this pattern is consistent with the spatial form of the anomalous surface fluxes associated with the NAO pattern (Cayan 1992). The strength of the correlation increases when the NAO index leads the SST, which indicates that SST is responding to atmospheric forcing on monthly time scales (Battisti et al. 1995; Delworth 1996; Deser and Timlin 1997). But SST observations also display a myriad of long-term (interannual and decadal) responses (Kushnir 1994; Hansen and Bezdek1996; Sutton and Allen 1997; Visbeck et al., 1998), which allows for the possibility that decadal and longer-term variations in the state of the ocean surface imprint themselves back on the atmosphere.
While intrinsic atmospheric variability may exhibit temporal incoherence, the ocean can respond to it with marked persistence or even oscillatory behavior. The time scales imposed by the heat capacity of the upper ocean, for example, can lead to low frequency variability of both SST and lower tropospheric air temperature (Frankignoul and Hasselmann, 1977; Barsugli and Battisti 1998). Basin-wide, spatially-coherent atmospheric modes such as the NAO may also interact with the mean oceanic advection in the North Atlantic to preferentially select quasi-oscillatory SST anomalies with long time scales (Saravanan and McWilliams 1998). Stochastic atmospheric forcing may also excite selected dynamical modes of oceanic variability that act to redden the SST spectrum (Griffies and Tziperman 1995; Frankignoul et al. 1997; Capotondi and Holland 1997; Saravanan and McWilliams 1997; 1998; Saravanan et al. 1999). These theoretical studies are supported by observations of winter SST anomalies born in the western subtropical gyre that spread eastward along the path of the Gulf Stream and North Atlantic Current with a transit time of roughly a decade (Sutton and Allen 1997). Moreover, the SST anomalies reflect anomalies in the heat content of the deep winter mixed layers which, when exposed to the atmosphere in winter (Alexander and Deser 1995), could provide the forcing to drive the NAO on the advective time scale of the gyre (McCartney et al. 1996).
A key question is the sensitivity of the middle latitude atmosphere to changes in surface boundary conditions, including SSTs, sea-ice, and/or land. Robertson et al. (1999a) report that changing the SST distribution in the North Atlantic affects the frequency of occurrence of different regional low-frequency modes and substantially increases the interannual variability of the NAO simulated by their AGCM. The experiment by Rodwell et al. (1999) also points to SST in the North Atlantic as having a marked effect on NAO variability. By forcing their AGCM with observed SST patterns and sea ice distributions, they successfully captured much of the multi-annual to multi-decadal variability in the observed NAO index since 1947, including about 50% of the observed strong upward trend over the past 30 years. However, many other AGCM experiments have led to rather confusing and inconsistent conclusions (Kushnir and Held, 1996). Additionally, several recent studies conclude that NAO variability is closely tied to SSTs over the tropical South Atlantic (Xie and Tanimoto 1998; Rajagopalan et al. 1998; Robertson et al. 1999b). Variations in the tropical Atlantic are substantial and involve strong interannual and decadal variations of meridional SST gradients. Such variations, which most likely affect the Hadley circulation, potentially modulate North Atlantic middle latitude atmospheric variability through an atmospheric bridge mechanism akin to that acting over the Pacific (e.g., Lau and Nath 1996; Trenberth et al. 1998). The response of the atmosphere to changes in tropical, middle and high latitude SST distributions within the Atlantic Basin remains a problem that needs to be addressed.
The role of sea ice in producing atmospheric variability is also not well understood. Changes in sea-ice cover in both the Labrador and Greenland Seas as well as over the Arctic appear to be well correlated with the NAO (Deser et al. 1999). The relationship between the sea level pressure (SLP) and ice anomaly fields is consistent with the notion that atmospheric circulation anomalies force the sea ice variations (Prisenberg et al. 1997). Feedbacks or other influences of winter ice anomalies on the atmosphere have been more difficult to detect, although Deser et al. (1999) suggest that a local response of the atmospheric circulation to the reduced sea ice cover east of Greenland in recent years is also apparent.
Watanabe and Nitta (1999) have suggested that land processes are responsible for decadal changes in the NAO. They find that the change toward a more positive wintertime NAO index in 1989 was accompanied by large changes in snow cover over Eurasia and North America. Moreover, the relationship between snow cover and the NAO was even more coherent when the preceding fall snow cover was analyzed, suggesting that the atmosphere may have been forced by surface conditions over the upstream land mass. Watanabe and Nitta (1998) reproduce a considerable part of the atmospheric circulation changes by prescribing the observed snow cover anomalies in an AGCM.
Several recent studies suggest that both the oceanic wind forced gyre circulation and the thermohaline circulation can actively interact with atmospheric flow to produce coupled decadal and interdecadal climate variability. Latif and Barnett (1996) and Grîtzner et al (1998) argued that when positive SST and sub-surface heat content anomalies in the central North Atlantic, are created by an enhanced subtropical ocean gyre circulation. The response in the atmosphere is an anticyclonic circulation pattern and a weakened storm track, which locally enhances the SST anomalies. The atmospheric response, however, also consists of a wind stress curl anomaly that spins down the subtropical gyre, thereby reducing the northward transport of heat and eventually creating negative SST and sub-surface heat content anomalies. This lag between positive and negative feedback between the ocean and the atmosphere leads to oscillatory behavior on decadal time scales. Other studies have suggested a coupled mode of variability involving the thermohaline circulation. The modeling results of Timmermann et al. (1998), for instance, suggested that an anonymously strong thermohaline circulation produces positive SST anomalies over the North Atlantic. The atmospheric response is a strengthened NAO, which, in turn, produces anomalous fresh water fluxes, and Ekman transport off Newfoundland and the Greenland Sea. The resulting reduction in sea surface salinity is advected by the subpolar gyre and eventually reduces the convective activity south of Greenland, thereby weakening the strength of the thermohaline circulation. The outcome is reduced poleward oceanic heat transport and the formation of negative SST anomalies, which completes the phase reversal and results in multi-decadal variability. It must be recognized, however, that the presence of periodicity or correlated behavior between the atmosphere and ocean in both observations and models does not necessarily imply the existence of a coupled mode. Either damped modes of the uncoupled ocean that are stochastically excited by atmospheric variability (e.g., Saravanan and McWilliams 1998) or unstable modes of the uncoupled ocean that express themselves spontaneously (e.g., Jin 1997; Goodman and Marshall 1999; Weng and Neelin 1998) can also produce such behavior.
Objectives and goals of a Chapman conference on the NAO
Given the societal, economic and ecological impact of interannual to multidecadal NAO variability, it is of paramount importance to improve our dynamical understanding of the NAO, to assess its predictability, to quantify its impact on regional weather patterns and short-time scale climate variability, and to understand how the NAO might be modified by anthropogenic forcing.
It is clear from the large number of very recent studies cited above that these issues are presently of great interest to the scientific community. A substantial interest in Atlantic climate processes (and the NAO in particular) by researchers is also evident in the Draft Science and Implementation Plan for an Atlantic Climate Variability Experiment (ACVE) as a contribution to the international Climate Variability and Predictability Programme (CLIVAR). The CLIVAR initial implementation plan has also listed the NAO as one of its principal research areas.
We propose, therefore, to capitalize on this tremendous interest and hold a Chapman conference on the NAO in late 2000. Since it is quite possible and even likely that NAO variability is affected by more than one of the physical mechanisms described in the previous section, a the meeting will bring together leading researchers from different disciplines in an effort to improve understanding of the NAO and to assess the prospects for predictability.
Overall objectives of the conference will be to assess and further our understanding of:
_ the seasonal to decadal variability in the North Atlantic atmosphere, especially the NAO, and the response of the ocean to this variability;
_ the sensitivity of the atmosphere to changes in the underlying sea surface temperature and sea ice distribution in the middle and high latitudes;
_ the pathways by which the climate variability in the tropical Atlantic affects the climate variability in the North Atlantic, and vice versa;
_ the extent to which climate variability in the stratosphere is linked to tropospheric variations over the North Atlantic and Arctic;
_ the relationship between anthropogenic climate change and decadal climate variations such as those associated with the NAO;
_ the degree to which paleoclimate data can extend the instrumental records over the Atlantic basin;
_ and the extent to which seasonal-to-decadal NAO fluctuations are predictable.
Primary goals of the conference will be to move toward a consensus on the primary process or processes which are responsible for observed low frequency variations in the NAO, including its unprecedented upward trend over past 30 years, and to identify the key remaining issues and future research activities needed to resolve them.
Outline of Format and Schedule
The Conference will include seven half-day (3.5 days) sessions of presentations and posters. The aim is to allow plenty of time in each session for plenary discussion, which is the aspect most lacking from other conferences. Each session will be devoted to a primary topic. The first day's morning session will focus on a discussion of the NAO and global climate change, while the response of the ocean, land and sea-ice to variations in the NAO will be the focus of the afternoon session. The second day will focus on the mechanisms which govern NAO variability, including atmosphere-only and coupled (land-ocean-atmosphere-sea ice) processes. The morning session of the third day will center on instrumental and proxy records of NAO variability, while the impacts of NAO variability will be discussed in the afternoon. The final session will assess the prospects for predictability.
Each session will be four to four and one-half hours in duration, and each will begin with one or at most two invited papers. The intent is that the invited speakers will give a broad up-to-date overview of the session topic. These talks will be augmented by two to four shorter solicited presentations on cutting-edge research. Ample time will be given for discussion after the oral presentations, which will account about half of each session. The remaining time in each session will be allotted for viewing posters and reconvening for a plenary session to close out the topic. We will not have an afternoon session on Friday.
We will greatly encourage the contribution of posters. Poster sessions provide unsurpassed opportunities for participants to interact for extended periods in an informal setting. We hope to have the posters displayed all week if space permits; otherwise, we will have two posters sessions. The first will include the first four session topics and will be displayed Tuesday and Wednesday, while the second will include the final three session topics and will be displaced Thursday and Friday. Poster sessions will be held in an area adjoining the meeting area. We will also give all poster authors the opportunity to give a very brief presentation (a single overhead) on their poster before each poster session.
Program Committee
Fifteen members compose the Program Committee. Members are the Principal Conveners, J. Hurrell, Y. Kushnir and M. Visbeck, and twelve additional scientists who will organize and lead the seven individual sessions. All have agreed to serve in this capacity. In addition, two other scientists (B. Dickson and J. M. Wallace) have agreed to act as advisors. The Program Committee is diverse and represents a good balance between North American and European scientists. It represents those countries most interested in and supportive of Atlantic climate research. It is comprised of experts in the following areas:
_ diagnostic analyses (models and observations) of interannual to multidecadal climate variability
_ predictability (interannual to decadal)
_ stratospheric-tropospheric interactions
_ atmosphere-sea ice-ocean interactions
_ tropical-midlatitude-polar interactions
_ paleoclimatology
Each session will focus on a particular topic, which will be in the area of specialty of the committee members leading that session. The Program Committee will be responsible for organizing each day's session, including selecting and contacting invited speakers and reviewing abstracts for the selection of contributed papers.
The sessions are organized as follows (with the committee members in charge listed):
Tuesday a.m.: Global climate change and the NAO
(H. Graf, Y. Kushnir, and M. Visbeck)
Tuesday p.m.: Ocean, land, sea-ice response to the NAO
(T. Delworth and M. McCartney)
Wednesday a.m.: Atmospheric processes
(M. Baldwin and L. Polvani)
Wednesday p.m.: Coupled ocean-land-sea ice-atmosphere processes
(J. Marshall and C. Deser)
Thursday a.m.: Indices (instrumental and proxy)
(C. Appenzeller and J. Hurrell)
Thursday p.m.: Impacts of the NAO
(K. Drinkwater and P. Lamb)
Friday a.m.: Predictability
(D. Stephenson and R. Sutton)
References for Scientific Statement
Alexander, M. A., and C. Deser, 1995: A mechanism for the recurrence of winter time midlatitude SST anomalies. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 25, 122-137.
Appenzeller, C., T. F. Stocker and M. Anklin, 1998a: North Atlantic oscillation dynamics recorded in Greenland ice cores. Science, 282, 446-449.
Appenzeller, C., J. Schwander, S. Sommer, and T. F. Stocker, 1998b: The North Atlantic oscillation and its imprint on precipitation and ice accumulation in Greenland. Geophysical Research Letters, 25, 1939-1942.
Appenzeller, C., A. K. Weiss, and J. Staehelin, 1999: North Atlantic oscillation modulates total ozone winter trends. Science, submitted.
Baldwin, M. P., X. Cheng, and T. J. Dunkerton, 1994: Observed correlations between winter-mean tropospheric and stratospheric circulation anomalies. Geophysical Research Letters, 21, 1141-1144.
Baldwin, M. P., and T. J. Dunkerton, 1999: Propagation of the Arctic Oscillation from the stratosphere to the troposphere. Journal of Geophysical Research, submitted.
Barsugli, J. J., and D. S. Battisti, 1998: The basic effects of atmosphere-ocean thermal coupling on midlatitude variability. Journal of Atmospheric Science, 55, 477-493.
Battisti, D. S., U. S. Bhatt, and M. A. Alexander, 1995: A modeling study of the interannual variability in the wintertime North Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Climate, 8, 3067-3083.
Bjerknes, J., 1964: Atlantic air-sea interaction. Adv. Geophys., 10, 1-82.
Capotondi, A., and W. R. Holland, 1997: Decadal variaiblity in an idealized ocean model and its sensitivity to surface boundary conditions. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 27, 1072-1093.
Cavalieri, D. J., P. Gloersen, C. L. Parkinson, J. C .Comiso, and H. J. Zwally, 1997: Observed hemispheric asymmetry in global sea ice changes. Science, 278, 1104-1106.
Cayan, D. R., 1992: Latent and sensible heat flux anomalies over the northern oceans: the connection to monthly atmospheric circulation. Journal of Climate, 5, 354-369.
Cheng, X., and T. J. Dunkerton, 1995: Orthogonal rotation of spatial patterns derived from singular value decomposition analysis. Journal of Climate, 8, 2631-2643.
Chapman, W. L., and J. E. Walsh, 1993: Recent variations of sea ice and air temperature in high latitudes. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 74, 33-47.
Cook, E. R., R. D. D'Arrigo, and K. R. Briffa, 1998: A reconstruction of the North Atlantic Oscillation using tree-ring chronologies from North America and Europe. Holocene, 8, 9-17.
Corti, S., F. Molteni, and T. N. Palmer, 1999: Signature of recent climate change in frequencies of natural atmospheric circulation regimes. Nature, 398, 799-802.
Dai, A., I. Y. Fung, and A. D. Del Genio, 1997: Surface observed global land precipitation variations during 1900-88. Journal of Climate, 10, 2943-2962.
Delworth, T. L., 1996: North Atlantic interannual variability in a coupled ocean-atmosphere model. Journal of Climate, 9, 2356-2375.
Deser, C., and M. L. Blackmon, 1993: Surface climate variations over the North Atlantic Ocean during winter: 1900-1993. Journal of Climate, 6, 1743-1753.
Deser, C., and M. S. Timlin, 1997: Atmosphere-ocean interaction on weekly time scales in the North Atlantic and Pacific. Journal of Climate, 10, 393-408.
Deser, C., J. E. Walsh, and M. S. Timlin, 1999: Arctic sea ice variability in the context of recent wintertime atmospheric circulation trends. Journal of Climate, in press.
Dickson, B., 1999: All change in the Arctic. Nature, 397, 389-391.
Dickson, B., J. Meincke, I. Vassie, J. Jungclaus, and S. Osterhus, 1999: Nature, 397, 243-246.
Dickson, R. R., J. Lazier, J. Meincke, P. Rhines, and J. Swift, 1996: Long-term co-ordinated changes in the convective activity of the North Atlantic. Prog. Oceanogr., 38, 241-295.
Frank, P., 1997: Changes in the glacier area in the Austrian Alps between 1973 and 1992 derived from LANDSAT data. MPI report 242, 21 pp.
Frankignoul, C. and K. Hasselmann, 1977: Stochastic climate models, II. Application to sea-surface temperature variability and thermocline variability. Tellus, 29, 284-305.
Frankignoul, C., P. Muller, and E. Zorita, 1997: A simple model of the decadal response of the ocean to stochastic wind forcing. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 8, 1533-1546.
Fromentin, J.-M., and B. Planque, 1996: Calanus and environment in the eastern North Atlantic. II. Influence of the North Atlantic Oscillation on C. Finmarchicus and C. Helgolandicus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 134, 111-118.
Goodman, J., and J. Marshall, 1999: A model of decadal middle-latitude atmosphere-ocean coupled modes. Journal of Climate, 12, 621-641.
Graf, H.-F., J. Perlwitz, I. Kirchner, and I. Schult, 1995: Recent northern winter climate trends, ozone changes and increased greenhouse gas forcing. Contrib. Phys. Atmos., 68, 233-248.
Griffies, S. M., and E. Tziperman, 1995: A linear thermohaline oscillator driven by stochastic atmospheric forcing. Journal of Climate, 8, 2440-2453.
Grîtzner, A., M. Latif, and T. P. Barnett, 1998: A decadal climate cycle in the North Atlantic Ocean as simulated by the ECHO coupled GCM. Journal of Climate, 11, 831-847.
Hagen, J. O., 1995: Recent trends in the mass balance of glaciers in Scandinavia and Svalbard. Proceedings of the international symposium on environmental research in the Arctic. Watanabe, Okitsugu (Eds.), Tokyo, Japan, National Institute of Polar Research, 343-354.
Hansen, D. V., and H. F. Bezdek, 1996: On the nature of decadal anomalies in North Atlantic sea surface temperature. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101, 8749-8758.
Houghton, R. W., 1996: Subsurface quasi-decadal fluctuations in the North Atlantic. Journal of Climate, 9, 1363-1373.
Hurrell, J. W., 1995a: Transient eddy forcing of the rotational flow during northern winter. Journal of Atmospheric Science, 52, 2286-2301.
Hurrell, J. W., 1995b: Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation regional temperatures and precipitation. Science, 269, 676-679.
Hurrell, J. W., 1996: Influence of variations in extratropical wintertime teleconnections on Northern Hemisphere temperatures. Geophysical Research Letters, 23, 665--668.
Hurrell, J. W., and H. van Loon, 1997: Decadal variations in climate associated with the North Atlantic oscillation. Climatic Change, 36, 301-326.
Jin, F. F., 1997: A theory of interdecadal climate variability of the North Pacific ocean-atmosphere system. Journal of Climate, 8, 1821-1835.
Jones, P. D., T. Jonsson, and D. Wheeler, 1997: Extension of the North Atlantic Oscillation using early instrumental pressure observations from Gibraltar and south-west Iceland. International Journal of Climatology, 17, 1433-1450.
Kelly, P. M., P. D. Jones, and J. Pengqun, 1996: The spatial response of the climate system to explosive volcanic eruptions. International Journal of Climatology, 16, 537-550.
Kitoh, A., H. Doide, K. Kodera, S. Yukimoto, and A. Noda, 1996: Interannual variability in the stratospheric-tropospheric circulation in a coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM. Geophysical Research Letters, 23, 543-546.
Kodera, K., 1994: Influence of volcanic eruptions on the troposphere through stratospheric dynamical processes in the Northern Hemisphere winter. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99, 1273-1282.
Kodera, K., M. Chiba, H. Koide, A. Kitoh, an dY. Nikaidou, 1996: Interannual variability of the winter stratosphere and troposphere in the Northern Hemisphere. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 74, 365-382.
Kushnir, Y., 1994: Interdecadal variations in North Atlantic sea surface temperature and associated atmospheric conditions. Journal of Climate, 7, 142-157.
Kushnir, Y., and I. M. Held, 1996: Equilibrium atmospheric response to North Atlantic SST anomalies. Journal of Climate, 9, 1208-1220.
Kushnir, Y., V. J. Cardone, J. G. Greenwood, and M. Cane, 1997: On the recent increase in North Atlantic wave heights. Journal of Climate, 10, 2107-2113.
Latif, M.., and T. Barnett, 1996: Decadal climate variability over the North Pacific and North America-dynamics and predictability. Journal of Climate, 9, 2407-2423.
Lau, N.-C. and M. J. Nath , 1991: Variability of the baroclinic and barotropic transient eddy forcing associated with monthly changes in the midlatitude storm tracks. Journal of Atmospheric Science, 48, 2589-2613.
Lau, N.-C., and M. J. Nath, 1996: The role of the "atmospheric bridge" in linking tropical Pacific ENSO events to extratropical SST anomalies. Journal of Climate, 9, 2036-2057.
Luterbacher, J., C. Schmutz, D. Gyalistras, E. Xoplaki, and H. Wanner, 1999: Reconstruction of monthly NAO and EU indices back to AD 1675, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2745-2748.
Mann, M. E., 1999: Large-scale climate variability and connections with the middle east during the past few centuries. Climatic Change, submitted.
Maslanik, J. A., M C. Serreze, and R. G. Barry, 1996: Recent decreases in Arctic summer ice cover and linkages to atmospheric circulation anomalies. Geophysical Research Letters, 23, 1677-1680.
McCartney, M. S., R. G. Curry, and H. F. Bezdek, 1996: North Atlantic's transformation pipeline chills and redistributed subtropical water. Oceanus, 39, 19-23.
McPhee, M. G., T. P. Stanton, J. H. Morison, and D. G. Martinson, 1998: Geophysical Research Letters, 25, 1729-1732.
Morison, J., K. Aagaard, M. Steele, 1998. Rep. Study Arctic Change Workshop, Rep. No. 8, Arctic System Science, Seattle, WA.
Nakamura, H., 1996: Year-to-year and interdecadal variability in the activity of intraseasonal fluctuations in the Northern Hemisphere wintertime circulation. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 55, 19-32.
Osborne, T. J., K. R. Briffa, S. F. B. Tett, P. D. Jones, and R. M. Trigo, 1999: Evaluation of the North Atlantic oscillation as simulated by a climate model. Climate Dynamics, in press.
Parkinson, C. L., D. J. Cavalieri, P. Gloersen, H. J. Zwally and J. Comiso, 1998: Variability of the Arctic sea ice cover, 1978-1996. Journal of Geophysical Research, in press.
Perlwitz, J., and H.-F. Graf, 1995: The statistical connection between tropospheric and stratospheric circulation of the Northern Hemisphere in winter. Journal of Climate, 8, 2281-2295.
Post, E. & Stenseth 1999. Climate change, plant phenology, and northern ungulates. Ecology, 80, 1322-1339.
Post, E, Forchhammer, M.C. & STENSETH, N.C. 1999. Population ecology and climate change: consequences of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). Ecological Bulletins, in press.
Prisenberg, S. J., I. K. Peterson, S. Narayanan, and J. U. Umoh, 1997: Interaction between atmosphere, ice cover, and ocean off Labrador and Newfoundland from 1962-1992. Can. J. Aquat. Sci., 54, 30-39.
Rajagopalan, R., Y. Kushnir and Y. M. Tourre, 1998: Observed decadal midlatitude and tropical Atlantic climate variability. Geophysical Research Letters, 25, 3967-3970.
Randel, W. J., and F. Wu, 1999: Cooling of the Arctic and Antarctic polar stratospheres due to ozone depletion. Journal of Climate, 12, 1467-1479.
Robertson, A. W., M. Ghil and M. Latif, 1999a: Interdecadal changes in atmospheric low-frequency variability with and without boundary forcing. Journal of Atmospheric Science, submitted.
Robertson, A. W., C. R. Mechoso and Y.-J. Kim, 1999b: The influence of Atlantic sea surface temperature anomalies on the North Atlantic Oscillation. Journal of Climate, submitted.
Rodwell, M. J., D. P. Rowell, and C. K. Folland, 1999: Oceanic forcing of the wintertime North Atlantic oscillation and European climate. Nature, 398, 320-323.
Saravanan, R., 1998: Atmospheric low frequency variability and its relationship to midlatitude SST variability: studies using the NCAR Climate System Model. Journal of Climate, 11, 1386-1404.
Saravanan, R., and J. C. McWilliams, 1997: Stochasticity and spatial resonance in interdecadal climate fluctuations. Journal of Climate, 10, 2299-2320.
Saravanan, R., and J. C. McWilliams, 1998: Advective ocean-atmosphere interaction: an analytical stochastic model with implications for decadal variability. Journal of Climate, 11, 165-188.
Saravanan, R., G. Danabasoglu, S. C. Doney, and J. C. McWilliams, 1999: Decadal variability and predictability in the midlatitude ocean-atmosphere system. Journal of Climate, submitted.
Schmutz, C., Luterbacher, J., Gyalistras, D., Xoplaki, E., and H. Wanner, 2000: Can we trust proxy-based NAO index reconstructions? Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 1135-1138.
Shabbar, A., K. Higuchi, W. Skinner, and J. L. Knox, 1997: The association between the BWA index and winter surface temperature variability over eastern Canada and west Greenland. International Journal of Climatology, 17, 1195-1210.
Shindell, D. T., R. L. Miller, G. Schmidt, and L. Pandolfo, 1999: Simulation of recent northern winter climate trends by greenhouse-gas forcing. Nature, 399, 452-455.
Siggurdson, O., and T. Jonsson, 1995: Relation of glacier variations to climate changes in Iceland. Annals of Glaciology, 21, 263-270.
Stenseth, N. C., K.-S. Chan, H. Tong, R. Boonstra, S. Bouting, C. J. Krebs, E. Post, M. O'Donoghue, N. G. Yoccoz, M. C. Forchhammer, and J. W. Hurrell, 1999: Common dynamic structure of Canadian Lynx populations within three geo-climatic zones. Science, in press.
Stockton, C. W., and M. F. Glueck, 1999: Long-term variability of the North Atlantic oscillation (NAO). Proc. Amer. Met. Soc. Tenth Symp. Global Change Studies, 11-15 January, 1999, Dallas, TX, 290-293.
Sutton, R. T., and M. R. Allen, 1997: Decadal predictability of North Atlantic sea surface temperature and climate. Nature, 388, 563-567.
Sy, A,. M. Rhein, J. R. N. Lazier, K. P. Koltermann, J. Meincke, A. Putzka, and M. Bersch, 1997: Surprisingly rapid spreading of newly formed intermediate waters across the North Atlantic Ocean. Nature, 386, 675-679.
Ting, M. and N.-C. Lau, 1993: A diagnostic and modeling study of the monthly mean wintertime anomalies appearing in an 100-year GCM experiment. Journal of Atmospheric Science, 50, 2845-2867.
Thompson, D. W. J., and J. M. Wallace, 1998: The arctic oscillation signature in the wintertime geopotential height and temperature fields. Geophysical Research Letters, 25,1297-1300.
Thompson, D. W. J., and J. M. Wallace, 1999: Annual modes in the extratropical circulation Part I: month-to-month variability. Journal of Climate, in press.
Thompson, D. W. J., J. M. Wallace, and G. C. Hegerl, 1999: Annual modes in the extratropical circulation Part II: trends. Journal of Climate, submitted.
Timmermann, A., M. Latif, R. Voss, and A. Grîtzner, 1998: Northern Hemisphere interdecadal variability: a coupled air-sea mode. Journal of Climate, 11, 1906-1931.
Trenberth, K. E., and J. W. Hurrell, 1999: Comment on The interpretation of short climate records with comments on the North Atlantic and Southern Oscillations. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, in press.
Trenberth, K. E., G. W. Branstator, D. Karoly, A. Kumar, N.-C. Lau, and C. Ropelewski, 1998: Progress during TOGA in understanding and modeling global teleconnections associated with tropical sea surface temperatures. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103, 14291-14324.
Visbeck, M., H. Cullen, G. Krahmann, N. Naik, 1998: An ocean model's response to North Atlantic Oscillation-like wind forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 4521-4524.
Volodin, E. M., and V. Ya. Galin, 1999: Numerical simulation of ozone depletion influence on winter atmosphere circulation in Northern Hemisphere last decade. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, submitted.
Wallace, J. M. and N.-C. Lau, 1985: On the role of barotropic energy conversions in the general circulation. Advances in Geophysics, 28A, 33-74.
Wallace, J. M., Y. Zhang, and J. A. Renwick, 1995: Dynamic contribution to hemispheric mean temperature trends. Science, 270, 780--783.
Walsh, J. E., W. L. Chapman, and T. L. Shy, 1996: Recent decrease of sea level pressure in the central Arctic. Journal of Climate, 9, 480-486.
Watanabe, M. and T. Nitta, 1998: Relative impact of snow and sea surface temperature anomalies on an extreme phase in the winter atmospheric circulation. Journal of Climate, 11, 2837-2857.
Watanabe, M. and T. Nitta, 1999: Decadal changes in the atmospheric circulation and associated surface climate variations in the Northern Hemisphere winter. Journal of Climate, 12, 494-510.
Weng, W., and J. D. Neelin, 1998: On the role of ocean-atmosphere interaction in midlatitude interdecadal variability. Geophysical Research Letters, 25, 167-170.
Wunch, C., 1999: The interpretation of short climate records, with comments on the North Atlantic and Southern Oscillations. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 80, 257-270.
Xie, S.-P. and Y. Tanimoto, 1998: A pan-Atlantic decadal climate oscillation. Geophysical Research Letters, 25, 2185-2188.