Earth Systems Field School
Biosphere 2 Center/Columbia University

Performance Evaluation Form

NAME OF STUDENT TO BE EVALUATED:__________________________________

Please use this form to give feedback to your peers about their group skills and where they can improve.

Criteria:
Poor: Performance below the acceptable level. Is not an asset to the group, but a hindrance.
Fair: Performance that barely meets the acceptable level. Is not an asset or a hindrance.
Good: Performance that meets or exceeds the acceptable level. Is a definite asset.
Great: Performance that greatly exceeds the acceptable level. Is not only an asset, but is critical for the success realized by the team.

		poor	fair	good	great
		1	2	3	4
Dependability	The degree to which the person could be counted on to complete tasks both independently and with others
Communication	The degree to which the person effectively expressed ideas and opinions to the group, and promoted dialog through good listening and reflection
Working Relationship	The degree to which the person effectively worked with others to promote tact, diplomacy and cooperation. Was he/she easy to get along with? Did she/he have respect for othersÕ (time, opinions, abilities, etc.)?
Quality of work	The degree to which the person provided a useful product to the group
Quantity of work	The relative amount which the person contributed to the groupÕs product.

TOTAL SCORE ________________